Introduction: Navigating the Crypto Landscape
Cryptocurrencies and Web3 projects have captivated the imagination of investors, promising novel ways to participate in the digital economy. However, as highlighted by Thomas P. Vartanian in his recent op-ed , the lack of regulatory oversight in the cryptocurrency space raises significant concerns.
Regulatory Imperatives: Bridging the Oversight Gap
A pivotal point raised by Vartanian is the absence of substantial government oversight in the cryptocurrency realm, particularly concerning investment contracts. Vartanian rightfully emphasizes that intermediaries dealing with investment contracts, including cryptocurrencies, should adhere to securities laws and register with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
Fundraising Dynamics: ICOs vs. ETOs
A noteworthy addition to this discourse is the distinction between two fundraising methods within the Web3 space: Initial Coin Offering ("ICO") and Reg A+ Equity Crowdfunding via Equity Token Offering ("ETO"). While ICOs involve selling cryptocurrency tokens in a largely unregulated environment, ETO adopts a more traditional, regulated approach, offering ownership shares subject to SEC and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") oversight.
Mitigating ICO Risks: The Case for Responsible Investor Protection
Vartanian's concerns about the risks associated with ICOs are justified. The lack of regulation can make ICOs more accessible and expedient, but it also exposes investors to higher risks of fraud and financial loss. In contrast, ETO, while subject to regulatory hurdles, provides enhanced protection for investors through rigorous disclosure requirements and adherence to specific standards.
Reg A+: A Regulatory Haven for Web3 Companies
An essential addition to this conversation is the regulatory framework provided by Regulation A+ ("Reg A+") of the JOBS Act. This regulation offers Web3 companies an option for equity crowdfunding with fundraising flexibility. Reg A+ allows companies to offer securities to both accredited and non-accredited investors, up to USD $75 million per year, without mandatory SEC registration.
Navigating Legal Risks: A Counsel's Role in Web3 Compliance
The article rightly underscores the legal risks associated with ICOs violating securities laws. According to the SEC, the majority of ICOs violate security laws, as tokens are often considered investment contracts under the Howey Test. This emphasizes the crucial role of legal counsel for Web3 companies, ensuring compliance with pertinent security laws and safeguarding both the company and its investors.
Strategic Separation: Mitigating Legal Risks in Web3 Projects
In an effort to further mitigate legal risks, Ohanae introduces a strategic approach whereby Web3 companies can segregate their equity securities from the project by establishing a distinct entity subject to securities laws. This separation enables companies to offer non-security digital assets without contravening regulations, ensuring compliance, and safeguarding both investors and the project's sustainability.
Conclusion: Striking a Balance for Responsible Growth
To conclude, the evolving terrain of Web3 projects demands a nuanced balance between innovation and regulatory compliance. The insights shared by Vartanian, complemented by additional perspectives from Ohanae, underscore the imperative need for a comprehensive regulatory framework. Achieving this equilibrium will not only protect investors but also cultivate the responsible growth of the Web3 ecosystem in the years to come.
Thomas Vartanian op-ed:
How many more times will we be conned by crypto?
Related Article:
Transforming OTC Securities with Web3 Innovation and Confidence
Disclaimer
An offering statement regarding this offering has been filed with the SEC. The SEC has qualified that offering statement, which only means that the company may make sales of the securities described by the offering statement. It does not mean that the SEC has approved, passed upon the merits or passed upon the accuracy or completeness of the information in the offering statement. The offering circular that is part of that offering statement is at https://vdr.ohanae.com/projects/ohanae. You should read the offering circular before making any investment.
Ohanae Securities LLC is a subsidiary of Ohanae, Inc. and member of FINRA/SIPC. Additional information about Ohanae Securities LLC can be found on BrokerCheck. Ohanae Securities LLC is in discussions with FINRA about exploring the expansion of business lines for the broker/dealer. Any statements regarding abilities of Ohanae Securities LLC are subject to FINRA approval and there are no guarantees FINRA will approve the broker/dealer’s expansion.
Ohanae Securities is seeking approval to be a special purpose broker-dealer that is performing the full set of broker-dealer functions with respect to digital asset securities – including maintaining custody of these assets – in a manner that addresses the unique attributes of digital asset securities and minimizes risk to investors and other market participants. If approved, Ohanae Securities will limit its business to digital asset securities to isolate risk and having policies and procedures to, among other things, assess a given digital asset security’s distributed ledger technology and protect the private keys necessary to transfer the digital asset security.